Annabelle Degay, the daughter of Felomina Tan by another man, was three (3) years old when Felomina married on July 12, 1976 appellant Philip Tan, a widower with four children by his first wife (October 23, 1989, tsn, pp. 4). The appellant, whom Annabelle considered as her real father, was a carpenter by profession and Felomina, a weaver at Narda's Handicraft in La Trinidad, Benguet, with working hours that consisted of two shifts that alternated every two weeks: one shift from 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight, and the other from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (Ibid., tsn, pp. 8-10).
Annabelle was a sixteen year-old high school student at the San Jose High School in Poblacion, La Trinidad, Benguet, at the time of the rape incidents (Ibid., tsn. p. 11).
Around 7:00 o'clock in the evening of July 12, 1989, Annabelle was at home in Lubas, km. 5, La Trinidad, Benguet, together with her stepsisters Jennifer (21 years old), Annalyn (14) her half-sister Emily (daughter of appellant and Annabelle's mother) and appellant, Philip Tan, Jr. The mother of Annabelle, Felomina, was then on a night shift duty. After dinner, Annabelle and her stepsister Jennifer, upon appellant's orders, massaged him as they usually did every night, for about an hour and a half; appellant was lying down, wearing only his briefs, and in this position, they would see his penis and he would let his feet touch Annabelle's and Jennifer's private parts (Ibid., tsn, pp. 10-13). After they had massaged all parts of appellant's body, Annabelle and Jennifer were ordered by appellant to go to sleep (Ibid., tsn, p. 15).
Annabelle, Jennifer, Annalyn and Emily all occupied one of the three rooms in the house. Jennifer and Emily slept on the bed, while Annabelle and Annalyn slept on the floor (Ibid., tsn, p. 15). On that particular night the lights in the house were out as the main switch was shut off from the master's bedroom occupied by the appellant (Ibid., tsn, p. 17). After about thirty minutes, Annabelle noticed the appellant enter their room (Ibid., p. 18). He slowly went near his stepdaughter Annabelle and embraced her, uttering, "It is cold." While uttering this, he forced Annabelle to take off her blanket (Ibid.). Wondering what her stepfather was trying to do and what his intentions were, Annabelle tried to fight back by struggling and kicking him; he was then in a straddling position. But he slapped her, pointed a kitchen knife on her right side, and boxed her thigh when she continued resisting (Ibid., pp. 19-22). It was at this point that Annabelle shouted at her stepsisters Jennifer and Annalyn to wake and help her. But no help was forthcoming from her stepsisters, however, because Jennifer, though awake (as she could easily be awakened), pretended to be asleep (Ibid., tsn, p. 22).
Annabelle continued struggling when appellant finally boxed her in the stomach, causing her to lose consciousness (Ibid., tsn, pp. 23-26). Annabelle started to fight back again, struggling until such time when appellant stood up and left the room (Ibid., tsn, p. 20). Annabelle, in tears, followed her stepfather, and in her anger, attempted to hit him. When she asked him why he did the bestial act to her, appellant replied, "Ay-ayam ngarud" (It's just a game) (Ibid., tsn, p. 27).
Annabelle immediately took a bath in the bathroom and as she washed herself, she noticed blood and white slippery fluid flowing out from her vagina (Ibid., tsn. p. 30). When she came out of the comfort room, she saw the appellant looking at her and smiling. Scared, Annabelle ran to her room (Ibid., tsn, p. 31). She then changed her panty and clothes and cried (Ibid., tsn, pp. 31-32). Thereafter, she fell asleep.
Annabelle woke up at 5:30 in the morning the following day, July 13, 1989, and started to cook rice. About fifteen (15) minutes later, appellant also woke up and went to her, warning that he would kill her and her mother should she tell the latter what happened between them (Ibid., tsn, p. 33). This scared Annabelle to no end because she knew that appellant was capable of maltreating her and her mother (Ibid.). Her stepsisters, too, when they woke up, acted as if nothing had happened the previous night (Ibid., tsn, p. 34). It was her mother, Felomina (who had returned at 2:00 o'clock on the morning from her night shift duty) who woke up and inquired why she had been crying the whole night and why there were lumps on her head. Annabelle did not say anything. Because of her silence, Felomina presumed that this was caused by appellant's having made unpleasant remarks at Annabelle again, or maybe had scolded or physically hurt her (January 23, 1990, tsn, p. 6).
Annabelle did not go to school that day because her body was in pain, and she could not concentrate anyway (October 24, 1989, tsn, p. 38).
In the evening of July 13, 1989, Felomina again worked on the night shift at the Narda's when after dinner, appellant called Jeniffer and Annabelle to massage him. After having massaged him for about an hour, Annabelle and Jennifer proceeded to study their lessons while awaiting the arrival of Felomina. Appellant, however, ordered them to go to sleep (October 24, 1989, tsn, pp. 38-39).
Around 10:00 o'clock, appellant opened the door of their room. Annabelle vainly tried to push the trunk of the door but appellant was able to get in. When she tried to awaken Annalyn who was sleeping beside her, appellant pushed her face to the floor (Ibid., tsn, p. 40). He then held Annabelle's hand and told her that they already did it before anyway (Ibid.). All of a sudden, appellant got hold of her hair and pushed her face to the floor (p. 40). Appellant then knelt down, rode on her back and bumped her head several times on the floor (Ibid., tsn, p. 40). Annabelle tried to face him so she could fight back but appellant pulled her legs straight such that she fell on her back (Ibid., tsn, p. 41). Finally, to keep her still, appellant boxed Annabelle's stomach, which rendered her unconscious (Ibid., p. 42). When she regained consciousness, Annabelle found herself naked and again, white slippery fluid was flowing out of her vagina. By then, appellant was no longer inside the room (Ibid., tsn, p. 42).
Later that night, Annabelle opened the door for her mother who arrived from work. Felomina had noticed that her daughter had been crying, but when she inquired as to the reason why, Annabelle, who had borne in mind her stepfather's threats, just keep silent. Thereafter, Annabelle went to the comfort room to wash (Ibid., tsn, pp. 43-44).
In the evening of July 15, 1989 appellant drank liquor with his friends in the house (Ibid., p. 49). When his friends left, they ate supper and thereafter, Annabelle and Annalyn massaged him (Ibid., tsn, p. 5'0). Afterwards, when they went to study, appellant ordered them to go to sleep. Not long thereafter, appellant entered their room. Annabelle attempted to block the door but appellant was able to enter by force (Ibid., tsn, pp.
50-51). At this juncture, Annabelle screamed which prompted Jennifer to inquire from her "Daddy" what he was doing. At this point, Annabelle embraced Annalyn but appellant pulled her and slapped her face. Then he left (Ibid., tsn, p. 51).
In the evening of July 25, 1989, when Felomina worked on the night shift from 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight, appellant entered Annabelle's room and boxed her several times until she felt weak. Then, he removed her pants, t-shirt and panty, and pushed her to the floor. He then removed his underwear and started mashing her breasts and kissing her. She could only struggle and push and kick him, but to no avail. Appellant was able to successfully insert his penis into her vagina. After having performed this bestial act on his stepdaughter, appellant proceeded to his own room. Annabelle noticed that while slippery fluid again flowed from her vagina (Ibid., tsn, pp. 56-60).
On July 28, 1989, after he was massaged, appellant ordered Annalyn to buy milk. When she returned, appellant ordered her and Emily to go to sleep (Ibid., tsn, pp. 60-62). Thereafter, appellant prepared milk for himself, Jennifer and Annabelle. Annabelle noticed however, that the glass of milk that was prepared for her tasted bitter such that she requested Jennifer to exchange her milk with hers. She was prevented from doing so by the appellant, however. Thus, she pretended to drink the milk since she intended to throw it away later. When she tried to do so, however, appellant scolded her and threatened that if she threw it, something III would happen to her (Ibid., tsn, p. 62). Because of the threat, she was forced to drink the milk; she fell asleep soon thereafter (Ibid., tsn, p. 63). When she woke up, she realized that appellant had sexual intercourse with her for she found herself naked and noticed that her vagina was slippery again (Ibid., tsn, pp. 63-64). She immediately stood up to wash herself in the bathroom. When she returned to her bedroom she could not sleep anymore (Ibid., tsn, p. 64). The following day, much as she wanted to finally tell her mother (who again asked her why she had bruises on her face and head) what had happened to her, she never attempted to do so for she did not know how (October 24, 1989, tsn, pp. 65-66).
In the evening of July 29, 1989, the appellant and his friends had a drinking spree inside their house (Ibid., tsn, pp. 68-69). When his friends left, appellant entered the room which Annabelle was sharing with her stepsisters (Ibid., tsn, p. 69). She tried in vain to stop the appellant from coming inside by pushing the door against him (Ibid.). When he was able to enter, appellant immediately embraced her tightly such that her efforts to kick him were to no avail. Irritated by her struggles, appellant hit Annabelle's head and boxed the right side of her stomach, causing her to lose consciousness (Ibid., tsn, p. 69). When she regained consciousness, she was already naked and her pants and panty were at the floor near her feet. White slippery fluid was also flowing from her vagina (Ibid., tsn, pp. 69-70; October 30, 1989, p. 3).
On August 7, 1989, Felomina again worked on night duty. When supper was prepared, appellant volunteered to cook the shrimps which he had bought earlier. The viand was bitter but appellant forced Annabelle to eat it (Oct. 30, 1989, tsn, pp. 4-5). Thereafter, they were ordered to immediately to go to sleep (Ibid., tsn, p. 5). Instead of going to sleep, Annabelle went to the toilet to wash her clothes. Appellant, however, knocked at the door and ordered her to go to sleep (Ibid., tsn, p. 5). Annabelle complied since she also became sleepy, but instead of sleeping at her usual space on the floor, she slept on top of the trunk near the place where their clothes were hanged (Ibid., tsn, pp. 5-6). Later, appellant entered the room but not finding her on the floor, he switched on the light. Appellant got mad when he saw Annabelle sleeping on top of the trunk and demanded why she had to sleep there (Ibid., tsn, p. 7). As she meekly stood up, appellant immediately embraced Annabelle (Ibid.). She struggled to resist his advances but appellant pushed her head to the floor, causing her to lose consciousness. Appellant, thus, succeeded in having carnal knowledge of her (Ibid., tsn, pp. 7-9).
Again, on August 11, at 9:30 p.m. appellant entered Annabelle's room while she and her stepsisters were sleeping. She woke up when appellant had removed her blanket and was embracing her. She kicked him, but he boxed her many times and hit her head on the floor, causing her to lose consciousness. When she recovered, she saw him about to stand up. He then told her that he was already through with his bestial act. Then she realized that she was already naked, and white slippery fluid was also coming out from her vagina (Ibid., tsn, pp. 16-17).
She woke up at 5:00 o'clock the following morning (August 12, 1989) and then proceeded to the bathroom to wash. After eating breakfast, she again went inside the bathroom and while inside, her mother knocked at the door, asking why she had been crying. Finally, this time, gathering enough courage, she told her mother everything that appellant had been doing to her. They both cried and embraced each other. Then her mother instructed her to collect all her clothes so that they could look for a place where they could stay. When they could not find a place at kms. 5 and 6, Annabelle volunteered to stay with her Manang Grace at Magsaysay Avenue, Baguio City (October 30, 1990, tsn, pp. 17-18).
Felomina went on leave of absence from her work on the evening of August 12, 1989 and went home. Before the arrival of her husband, she slept in the room of their children, at the floor which used to be occupied by Annabelle. Around 3:20 in the morning, appellant entered the room and held her legs, thinking that it was Annabelle whom he was holding. Appellant was surprised when it was Felomina who suddenly rose. Appellant exclaimed "Why are you here? where is Annabelle?" Felomina retorted that he should stop raping her daughter (January 23, 1990, tsn, pp. 12-14).
Having confirmed that her husband had really raped her daughter, Felomina sought the help of the barangay captain in the morning of August 13, 1989. The barangay captain advised her, however, to report the matter to the municipal hall since it involved a serious case (Ibid., tsn, p. 16). But ashamed of what her husband had done, Felomina hesitated on reporting the matter to the police. Finally, on August 21, 1989, the cry for justice for her defiled daughter prevailed over whatever love she had left for her rapist of a husband; she and Annabelle reported to the police the rape incidents (Ibid., tsn, pp. 16-17).
On August 21, 1989, Annabelle Degay was brought by her mother and other relatives to the Benguet General Hospital for physical examination. Dr. Susan Chungalao who conducted the medical examination prepared the Medico-Legal Certificate (Exhibit "A"), indicating the following findings upon internal examination:
— nulliparous
— Vagina admits 2 fingers with slight difficulty
— hymen with old healed lacerations at 5 o'clock, 7 o'clock
and 12 o'clock positions
— cervix — firm and close
— uterus — small
— no bleeding at time of examination (Exhibit "A").
1 On July 10, 1989 or two days before the first sexual assault, appellant filed an adoption proceeding to adopt complainant. However, appellant was not aware if the same was approved or not. (TSN. Philip Tan. Jr., March 19, 1990, p. 13).
2 Rollo, p. 32.
3 RTC decision dated February 26, 1991 penned by Judge Nicodemo T. Ferrer, p. 21; Rollo, p. 52.
4 Brief for the Appellee prepared by the Solicitor-General, pp. 4-19; Rollo, pp. 126-141.
5 Rollo, p.100; TSN, Ocular Inspection, March 26, 1990, p. 2.
6 Jennifer and Annalyn Tan are two of appellant's four (4) natural children with another woman before he married complainant's mother. The other two children being Nelson and Philip, Jr.
7 Emily is the daughter of appellant by complainant's mother.
8 People v. Cura, 310 Phil. 237, 247 (1995) citing People v. Dabon, 216 SCRA 656.
9 People v. Dones, G.R. No. 108743, March 13, 1996; People v. Remoto, 314 Phil. 432, 448 (1995); People v. Segundo, 228 SCRA 691 (1993); People v. Codilla, 224 SCRA 104; People v. Guibao, 217 SCRA 64, 74 (1993).
10 People vs. Remoto, supra; People v. Ulili, 44 SCAD 213 or 225 SCRA 594 (1993); People v. de los Reyes, 203 SCRA 707 (1993); People v. Viray, 164 SCRA 135 (1988).
11 People v. Villorente, 210 SCRA 647 (1992).
12 People v. Dado, 314 Phil. 635, 653 (1995); People v. Rafanan, 182 SCRA 811.
13 People v. Papa Talaboc, G.R. No. 103290, April 23, 1996.
14 TSNs: Nestor Tan, March 5, 1990, p. 12; Annabelle Degay, October, 23, 1989, p. 8; Filomena Tan, February 12, 1990, p. 4.
15 Rollo, p. 42.
16 TSN, Annabelle Degay, Ibid., p. 13; Rollo, pp. 42-43.
17 Ibid.
18 Rollo, pp. 100-101.
19 Exh. "1", Exh. "C", Sworn statement of Annabelle Degay; Record, p. 5.
xxx xxx xxx
"Q5: How many times did he rape you?
A: About 15 times in the Month of July whenever my mother work during night time at Narda's.
Q6: How about in the Month of August, how many times did your step-father raped you?
A: My step-father Philip Tan raped me from August 7, 1989 to August 11, 1989."
xxx xxx xxx
20 TSN, Annabelle Degay, December 5, 1989, pp. 15, 16. 19.
21 People v. Pastoral, 44 SCAD 604 (1993); People v. Dado, supra.
22 People v. Ramos, 315 Phil. 435 (1995); People v. Plaza, 312 Phil. 830 (1995).
23 People v. Custodio, 197 SCRA 538 (1991) and People v. Muñoz, 163 SCRA 780 cited in People v. Tacipit, 312 Phil. 295, 302 (1995).
24 People v. Briones, Jr., 44 SCAD 1057 (1993).
25 People v. Español, G.R. No. 105673, April 10, 1996; People v. Padilla, 312 Phil. 721 (1995); People v. Ducoy, 225 SCRA 1 (1993); People v. Jumamoy, 221 SCRA 333 (1993); People v. Lase, 219 SCRA 584 (1993).
26 177 SCRA 103, 108-109 (1989).
27 People v. Cura, supra. at 249.
28 People v. Jimenez, 250 SCRA 349 (1995); People v. Adlawan, 217 SCRA 489 (1993).
29 People v. Olivar, 215 SCRA 759 (1992); People v. Abuyan. Jr., 211 SCRA 662 (1992).
30 People v. Cabresos, 314 Phil. 250, 259-260 (1995).
31 People v. Silfavan, 151 SCRA 617, 629 (1987).
32 TSN, ibid., p. 12.
33 People v. Quiñones, 315 Phil. 48 (1995); People v. Manzana, 250 SCRA 152 citing People v. Oydoc, 125 SCRA 250 (1983); People v. Montefalcon, 243 SCRA 617 (1995); People vs. Soan, 243 SCRA 627 (1995); People v. Plaza, 242 SCRA 725 (1995); People v. Errojo, 229 SCRA 49 (1994); People v. Abordo, 224 SCRA 725 (1993); People v. Alib, 222 SCRA 517, 519 (1993);
34 People v. Rejano, 237 SCRA 627, 629 (1994).
35 Paraphrasing Justice Regalado in People v. Jimenez, supra at 357.
36 Ibid.
37 Ibid.
38 See People v. Vitor, 315 Phil. 419, 433 (1995), citing People v. Obejas, 229 SCRA 549 (1994).
39 G.R. No. 106977, July 17, 1996.
40 People v. Padilla, 312 Phil 721 (1993), citing People v. Florida, 214 SCRA 227 (1992) and People v. Matrimonio, 215 SCRA 613 (1992); People v. Codilla, 224 SCRA 104 (1993); People v. Dio, 44 SCAD 559 (1993).
41 RTC Decision, p. 12; Rollo, p. 101.
42 Ibid., p. 18; Rollo, p. 107.
43 US v. Macuti, 26 Phil. 170 (1913); People v. Kyamko, 222 SCRA 183 (1993).
44 See People v. Cura, supra, and People v. Dado, 314 Phil. 635 (1995).
45 Rollo, p. 109.
46 People v. Echegaray, G.R. No. 117472, June 25, 1996, citing People v. Espinoza, 247 SCRA 66 (1995); People v. Sanchez, 250 SCRA 14 (1995); People v. Godoy, 250 SCRA 676 (1995); People v. Magpayo, 226 SCRA 13 (1993); People v. Tismo, 204 SCRA 535 (1991); People v. Saldivia, 203 SCRA 461 (1991); People v. Patilan, 197 SCRA 354 (1991); People v. Yambao, 193 SCRA 571 cited in People v. Dado, supra.
47 People v. Gan, 46 SCRA 667 (1972), People v. Gamez, 124 SCRA 260 (1983), People v. Alcantara, 126 SCRA 425 (1983); People v. Ramilo, 146 SCRA 256 (1986) cited in People v. De Guzman, 216 SCRA 754 (1992) and in People v. Padilla, 312 Phil. 721 (1995); see also People v. Dones, supra.;
48 People v. Digno, Jr., 250 SCRA 237 (1995).
49 People v. Molina, 53 SCRA 495, 500-501 (1973), reiterated in People v. Egot, 130 SCRA 134 (1984) and in People v. Quidilla, 166 SCRA 778 (1988).
50 People v. dela Cruz, 251 SCRA 77 (1995).
51 Rollo, p. 109.
52 TSN, Filomena Tan, January 23, 1990, p. 13.
53 TSN, Philip Tan, Jr., March 19, 1990, p. 16.
54 Ibid., p. 17.
55 People v. Remoto, supra.; People v. Ramos, 315 Phil. 435 (1995); People v. Amador, 226 SCRA 241 (1993); People v. Ylarde, 224 SCRA 405 (1993).
56 This is premised on the reason that the party denying may not exactly remember the circumstance on which he bases his denial. (People v. Mendoza, 236 SCRA 666).
57 Article 14(6) Revised Penal Code; People v. Moreno, 220 SCRA 292 (1993).
58 See People v. Bersabal, 48 Phil. 439 where the court found that stepson-stepfather relationship is aggravating.
59 Art. 335 (Revised Penal Code). . . . Whenever the crime of rape is committed with the use of a deadly weapon . . . the penalty shall be reclusion perpetua. (emphasis ours).
60 Art. 63 in relation to Art. 335 of the Revised Penal Code. The case at bar may have invited the mandatory application of the supreme penalty of death under Art. 335 as amended by R.A. 7659. However, the amending law took effect after these rapes occurred.
61 People v. dela Cruz, supra at 79.
62 Paraphilia refers to the preference or addiction to unusual sexual practices.
63 People v. Guibao, supra., at p. 75 citing People v. Quidilla, 166 SCRA 778 (1988).
64 TSN, Degay, October 23, 1989, p. 27.
65 People v. Papa Talaboc, supra; People v. Abendaño, 312 Phil. 625 (1995); People v. Sartagoda, 221 SCRA 251; People v. Tismo, 204 SCRA 535; People v. Alegada, 201 SCRA 37 (1991); People v. Calixto, 193 SCRA 303; People v. Perez, 175 SCRA 203 (1989); People v. Cayaso, 158 SCRA 586;.
66 People v. Esguerra, G.R. No. 117482, May 8, 1996; People v. Toledo, 83 Phil. 777 (1949).